AMD Phenom II X4 P960 vs Intel Celeron N2920
The Celeron N2920 has 3% better performance than the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Phenom II X4 P960 and the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Phenom II X4 P960 CPU
The AMD Phenom II X4 P960 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The X4 P960 is compatible with S1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 45 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Phenom II X4 P960 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Phenom II X4 P960 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Phenom II X4 P960 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Phenom II X4 P960 has the 660th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron N2920 CPU
The Intel Celeron N2920 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2920 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron N2920 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2920 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N2920 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1860.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N2920 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N2920 has the 658th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Series | -- | Celeron |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | -- | Q4 2013 |
| Production Status | -- | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N2920 has 3% better performance than the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Phenom II X4 P960 is ranked 660th with a score of 1,542, and the Celeron N2920 is ranked 658th with a score of 1,582.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Phenom II X4 P960 and the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| A9-9420 | 1,632 | +6% |
| Pentium N3510 | 1,619 | +5% |
| Celeron 2955U | 1,604 | +4% |
| A4-6210 | 1,587.5 | +3% |
| Celeron N2920 | 1,582 | +3% |
| A6-9225 | 1,568 | +2% |
| Phenom II X4 P960 | 1,542 | |
| Celeron 1017U | 1,532 | -1% |
| A4-5150M | 1,531 | -1% |
| A9-9425 | 1,527 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,542 | 1,582 (+2.59%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | -- | 118.5 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | -- | 32.5 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,386 (+45.89%) | 950 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 737 (+33.51%) | 552 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Foundry | -- | Intel |
| Process Size | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | -- | Celeron |
| Microarchitecture | -- | Bay Trail |
| Codename | -- | Bay Trail-M |
| Memory Support | -- | DDR3 |
| ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1800.0 MHz | 1860.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | -- | 2000.0 MHz |
| Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 56 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | Intel BGA 1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 W | 7 W |
| TJ Max | -- | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | Phenom II X4 P960 | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | -- | HD Graphics |
| Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.