AMD FX-9800P vs Intel Celeron 2970M
The FX-9800P has 5% better performance than the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FX-9800P and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD FX-9800P CPU
The AMD FX-9800P is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2016. It is part of AMD's FX lineup, which is based on the Bristol Ridge microarchitecture. The FX-9800P is compatible with AMD Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R7 8CU integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The FX-9800P supports DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the FX-9800P has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 320 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FX-9800P features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.7 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The FX-9800P includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R7 8CU. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The FX-9800P has the 575th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron 2970M CPU
The Intel Celeron 2970M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2970M is compatible with FCPGA946 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron 2970M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 2970M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 2970M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 2970M has the 588th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Series | FX | -- |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2016 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The FX-9800P has 5% better performance than the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The FX-9800P is ranked 575th with a score of 2,393, and the Celeron 2970M is ranked 588th with a score of 2,272.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FX-9800P and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| A6-3410MX | 2,411 | +1% |
| A10-9620P | 2,399 | +0% |
| FX-9800P | 2,393 | |
| Core i3-380M | 2,391.5 | -0% |
| A10-9600P | 2,387 | -0% |
| Core M-5Y10c | 2,311 | -3% |
| PRO A12-9800B | 2,275 | -5% |
| Celeron 2970M | 2,272.5 | -5% |
| A8-3500M | 2,247 | -6% |
| A8-4500M | 2,243 | -6% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 2,393 (+5.3%) | 2,272.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 900 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 236 (+43.9%) | 164 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 74 | 85 (+14.86%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 1,109 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 496 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 2,554 (+70.15%) | 1,501 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,246 (+0.08%) | 1,245 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | -- |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Transistors | 3,100 million | 960 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Series | FX | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Bristol Ridge | -- |
| Codename | Bristol Ridge | -- |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | -- |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz | 2200.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3.6 GHz | -- |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | -- |
| Multiplier | 27.0x | -- |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | -- | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FP4 | FCPGA946 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 3.0 x8 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 37 W |
| TJ Max | 90 °C | 100 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | FX-9800P | Celeron 2970M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 8CU | -- |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.