AMD FX-9800P vs AMD A4-6210

VS
Performance
FX-9800P51% better
2,3936% of 36,991
A4-6210
1,587.54% of 36,991

The FX-9800P has 51% better performance than the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
FX-9800P
No data available
A4-6210
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FX-9800P and the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD FX-9800P CPU

The AMD FX-9800P is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2016. It is part of AMD's FX lineup, which is based on the Bristol Ridge microarchitecture. The FX-9800P is compatible with AMD Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R7 8CU integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The FX-9800P supports DDR4 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the FX-9800P has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 320 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FX-9800P features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.7 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The FX-9800P includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R7 8CU. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The FX-9800P has the 576th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A4-6210 CPU

The AMD A4-6210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-6210 is compatible with Socket FT3 (BGA769) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A4-6210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-6210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-6210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-6210 has the 658th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoFX-9800PA4-6210
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesFX--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2016--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
FX-9800P51% better
2,3936% of 36,991
A4-6210
1,587.54% of 36,991

The FX-9800P has 51% better performance than the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The FX-9800P is ranked 576th with a score of 2,393, and the A4-6210 is ranked 658th with a score of 1,587.5.

Performance per dollar
FX-9800P
No data available
A4-6210
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FX-9800P and the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:FX-9800P or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A6-3410MX2,411+1%
A10-9620P2,399+0%
FX-9800P2,393
Core i3-380M2,391.5-0%
A10-9600P2,387-0%
Pentium N35101,619-32%
Celeron 2955U1,604-33%
A4-62101,587.5-34%
Celeron N29201,582-34%
A6-92251,568-34%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:FX-9800P orA4-6210
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkFX-9800PA4-6210
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,393
(+50.74%)
1,587.5
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
236
(+75.46%)
134.5
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
74
(+97.33%)
37.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,109
(+115.76%)
514
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
496
(+165.24%)
187
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,554
(+70.95%)
1,494
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,246
(+103.93%)
611
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecFX-9800PA4-6210
ManufacturerAMDAMD
FoundryGlobalFoundries--
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors3,100 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecFX-9800PA4-6210
SeriesFX--
MicroarchitectureBristol Ridge--
CodenameBristol RidgeMullins
Memory SupportDDR4--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecFX-9800PA4-6210
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed2.7 GHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3.6 GHz--
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier27.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecFX-9800PA4-6210
L1 Cache320 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecFX-9800PA4-6210
SocketAMD Socket FP4Socket FT3 (BGA769)
PCI ExpressPCIe 3.0 x8--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W15 W
TJ Max90 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecFX-9800PA4-6210
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R7 8CURadeon R3 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.