PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD FX-7500 vs AMD Phenom II X4 N970

AMD
VS
AMD
Performance
FX-750015% better
2,236.56% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 N970
1,9405% of 36,991

The FX-7500 has 15% better performance than the Phenom II X4 N970 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
FX-7500
No data available
Phenom II X4 N970
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FX-7500 and the Phenom II X4 N970 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Phenom II X4 N970
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD FX-7500 CPU

The AMD FX-7500 is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of AMD's FX lineup, which is based on the Kaveri microarchitecture. The FX-7500 is compatible with AMD Socket FP3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R7 6CU integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The FX-7500 supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the FX-7500 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FX-7500 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.3 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The FX-7500 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R7 6CU. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The FX-7500 has the 591st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD Phenom II X4 N970 CPU

The AMD Phenom II X4 N970 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The X4 N970 is compatible with S1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 45 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Phenom II X4 N970 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Phenom II X4 N970 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Phenom II X4 N970 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Phenom II X4 N970 has the 617th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.24% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesFX--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2014--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
FX-750015% better
2,236.56% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 N970
1,9405% of 36,991

The FX-7500 has 15% better performance than the Phenom II X4 N970 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The FX-7500 is ranked 591st with a score of 2,236.5, and the Phenom II X4 N970 is ranked 617th with a score of 1,940.

Performance per dollar
FX-7500
No data available
Phenom II X4 N970
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the FX-7500 and the Phenom II X4 N970 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:FX-7500 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A8-3500M2,247+0%
A8-4500M2,243+0%
FX-75002,236.5
A10-4655M2,236-0%
Core i5-450M2,222-1%
Pentium B9701,989-11%
A6-52001,964.5-12%
Phenom II X4 N9701,940-13%
Celeron 63051,935.5-13%
Celeron N34501,925-14%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:FX-7500 orPhenom II X4 N970
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,236.5
(+15.28%)
1,940
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
153
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
55
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
689
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
310
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,970
(+18.53%)
1,662
CPU Mark Single-Thread
973
(+7.75%)
903
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
ManufacturerAMDAMD
FoundryGlobalFoundries--
Process Size28 nm45 nm
Transistors2,410 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
SeriesFX--
MicroarchitectureKaveri--
CodenameKaveri--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed2.1 GHz2200.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3.3 GHz--
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier21.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
SocketAMD Socket FP3S1
PCI ExpressPCIe 3.0 x8--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)19 W35 W
TJ Max102 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecFX-7500Phenom II X4 N970
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R7 6CU--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, BMI1, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.