AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD Pro A10-8700B
The Pro A10-8700B has 6% of the performance compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the EPYC 7702P and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD EPYC 7702P CPU
The AMD EPYC 7702P is a 64-core (128-thread) processor built for the server CPU market. It launched in Q3 2019. It is part of AMD's EPYC lineup, which is based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. The EPYC 7702P is compatible with AMD Socket SP3 motherboards and is fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
The EPYC 7702P supports DDR4 memory and features a octa-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 8 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the EPYC 7702P has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 96 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 256 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The EPYC 7702P features 64 total cores which can process 128 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The EPYC 7702P does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
About the AMD Pro A10-8700B CPU
The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Pro A10-8700B is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Pro A10-8700B has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro A10-8700B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Pro A10-8700B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Pro A10-8700B has the 671st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 791 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.55% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Series | EPYC | -- |
| Market Segment | Server | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2019 | -- |
| Production Status | Active | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Pro A10-8700B has 6% of the performance compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X.
Pro A10-8700B's 2,123.5 performance score ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the EPYC 7702P and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Pentium 2020M | 2,159 | +2% |
| Core i3-4012Y | 2,159 | +2% |
| A10-5745M | 2,155 | +1% |
| A10-8700P | 2,150.5 | +1% |
| Pentium B960 | 2,139 | +1% |
| Pro A10-8700B | 2,123.5 | |
| Core M-5Y51 | 2,122 | -0% |
| Core i3-3217U | 2,111.5 | -1% |
| A6-3400M | 2,092 | -1% |
| Pentium N4200 | 2,087 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | -- | 2,123.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 675 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | -- | 192 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | -- | 70 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 10,781 (+971.67%) | 1,006 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 1,103 (+132.21%) | 475 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | -- | 2,224 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | -- | 1,123 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Foundry | TSMC | -- |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 3,800 million | 3,100 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Series | EPYC | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Zen 2 | -- |
| Codename | Rome | Carrizo |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | -- |
| Memory Channels | Octa-channel | -- |
| ECC Memory | Yes | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 64 | 4 |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 2000.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3200.0 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | -- |
| Multiplier | 20.0x | -- |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB | -- |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket SP3 | Socket FP4 (968) |
| PCI Express | PCIe 4.0 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 W | 35 W |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | EPYC 7702P | Pro A10-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | -- | Radeon R6 Series |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, EMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AVX, AVX2, ABM, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, AES, RdRand, SHA, ADX, CLMUL, F16C, Real, Protected, SMM, FPU, NX bit, SMT, AMD-Vi, AMD-V, SME, TSME, SEV, SenseMi, Boost 2 | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.