AMD E2-7110 vs Intel Celeron N2940

VS
Performance
E2-71106% better
1,7255% of 36,991
Celeron N2940
1,6354% of 36,991

The E2-7110 has 6% better performance than the Celeron N2940 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
E2-7110
No data available
Celeron N2940
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E2-7110 and the Celeron N2940 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2940
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD E2-7110 CPU

The AMD E2-7110 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The E2-7110 is compatible with Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R2 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the E2-7110 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E2-7110 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 1800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The E2-7110 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R2 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E2-7110 has the 646th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2940 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2940 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2940 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2940 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2940 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2940 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1830.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.3 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2940 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2940 has the 652nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.42% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoE2-7110Celeron N2940
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Series--Celeron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2014
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
E2-71106% better
1,7255% of 36,991
Celeron N2940
1,6354% of 36,991

The E2-7110 has 6% better performance than the Celeron N2940 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The E2-7110 is ranked 646th with a score of 1,725, and the Celeron N2940 is ranked 652nd with a score of 1,635.

Performance per dollar
E2-7110
No data available
Celeron N2940
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E2-7110 and the Celeron N2940 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:E2-7110 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Atom x5-Z85501,737+1%
Pentium 2117U1,728+0%
E2-71101,725
Celeron N40001,712.5-1%
A8-71001,710-1%
A8-4555M1,654-4%
Celeron N40201,650-4%
A4-50001,635-5%
Celeron N29401,635-5%
A9-94201,632-5%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:E2-7110 orCeleron N2940
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkE2-7110Celeron N2940
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,725
(+5.5%)
1,635
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
140
(+26.7%)
110.5
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
37
(+4.23%)
35.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
533
(+6.6%)
500
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
184
(+10.18%)
167
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,517
(+46.29%)
1,037
CPU Mark Single-Thread
612
(+1.16%)
605
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecE2-7110Celeron N2940
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size28 nm22 nm
Transistors930 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecE2-7110Celeron N2940
Series--Celeron
Microarchitecture--Bay Trail
CodenameMullinsBay Trail-M
Memory Support--DDR3
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecE2-7110Celeron N2940
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz1830.0 MHz
Turbo Clock1800.0 MHz2.3 GHz
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecE2-7110Celeron N2940
L1 Cache256 KB56 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecE2-7110Celeron N2940
SocketSocket FP4Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W7 W
TJ Max--105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecE2-7110Celeron N2940
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R2 SeriesHD Graphics
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.