PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD E2-7110 vs AMD A4-3300M

AMD
VS
AMD
Performance
E2-711024% better
1,7255% of 36,991
A4-3300M
1,3964% of 36,991

The E2-7110 has 24% better performance than the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
E2-7110
No data available
A4-3300M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E2-7110 and the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD E2-7110 CPU

The AMD E2-7110 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The E2-7110 is compatible with Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R2 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the E2-7110 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E2-7110 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 1800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The E2-7110 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R2 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E2-7110 has the 645th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A4-3300M CPU

The AMD A4-3300M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A4-3300M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6480G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A4-3300M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-3300M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-3300M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1900.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.5 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-3300M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6480G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-3300M has the 674th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoE2-7110A4-3300M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Series--A4
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2011
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
E2-711024% better
1,7255% of 36,991
A4-3300M
1,3964% of 36,991

The E2-7110 has 24% better performance than the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The E2-7110 is ranked 645th with a score of 1,725, and the A4-3300M is ranked 674th with a score of 1,396.

Performance per dollar
E2-7110
No data available
A4-3300M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E2-7110 and the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:E2-7110 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Atom x5-Z85501,737+1%
Pentium 2117U1,728+0%
E2-71101,725
Celeron N40001,712.5-1%
A8-71001,710-1%
A6-5350M1,414.5-18%
A6-4400M1,403-19%
A4-3300M1,396-19%
Pentium 3560Y1,365-21%
A4-4300M1,355-21%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:E2-7110 orA4-3300M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkE2-7110A4-3300M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,725
(+23.57%)
1,396
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
140
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
37
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
533
(+34.94%)
395
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
184
231
(+25.54%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,517
(+113.66%)
710
CPU Mark Single-Thread
612
788
(+28.76%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecE2-7110A4-3300M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size28 nm32 nm
Transistors930 million1,178 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecE2-7110A4-3300M
Series--A4
Microarchitecture--Llano
CodenameMullinsLlano
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecE2-7110A4-3300M
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz1900.0 MHz
Turbo Clock1800.0 MHz2.5 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--19.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecE2-7110A4-3300M
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecE2-7110A4-3300M
SocketSocket FP4AMD Socket FS1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W35 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecE2-7110A4-3300M
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R2 SeriesRadeon HD 6480G
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.