AMD E2-7110 vs AMD A10-8700P
The A10-8700P has 25% better performance than the E2-7110 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E2-7110 and the A10-8700P for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD E2-7110 CPU
The AMD E2-7110 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The E2-7110 is compatible with Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R2 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the E2-7110 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The E2-7110 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 1800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The E2-7110 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R2 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The E2-7110 has the 645th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD A10-8700P CPU
The AMD A10-8700P is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2015. It is part of AMD's A10 lineup, which is based on the Excavator microarchitecture. The A10-8700P is compatible with AMD Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The A10-8700P supports DDR3-2133 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A10-8700P has a L2 cache of 2 MB in size which provides fast access to instructions and data.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A10-8700P features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1.8 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.2 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The A10-8700P includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A10-8700P has the 601st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Series | -- | A10 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | -- | Q2 2015 |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The A10-8700P has 25% better performance than the E2-7110 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The E2-7110 is ranked 645th with a score of 1,725, and the A10-8700P is ranked 601st with a score of 2,150.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E2-7110 and the A10-8700P for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i3-4012Y | 2,159 | +25% |
| A10-5745M | 2,155 | +25% |
| A10-8700P | 2,150.5 | +25% |
| Pentium B960 | 2,139 | +24% |
| Pro A10-8700B | 2,123.5 | +23% |
| Atom x5-Z8550 | 1,737 | +1% |
| Pentium 2117U | 1,728 | +0% |
| E2-7110 | 1,725 | |
| Celeron N4000 | 1,712.5 | -1% |
| A8-7100 | 1,710 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,725 | 2,150.5 (+24.67%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 140 | 194 (+38.57%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 37 | 69 (+86.49%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 533 | 1,129 (+111.82%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 184 | 506 (+175%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,517 | 2,237 (+47.46%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 612 | 1,143 (+86.76%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 930 million | 3,100 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| Series | -- | A10 |
| Microarchitecture | -- | Excavator |
| Codename | Mullins | Carrizo |
| Memory Support | -- | DDR3-2133 |
| Memory Channels | -- | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | -- | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1800.0 MHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Turbo Clock | 1800.0 MHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | -- | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | -- | 18.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | -- | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | Socket FP4 | AMD Socket FP4 |
| PCI Express | -- | PCIe 3.0 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| TJ Max | -- | 90 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | E2-7110 | A10-8700P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R2 Series | Radeon R6 |
| Extensions / Technologies | -- | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4, SSE4a, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, TBM, XOP, AMD64, AMD-V, Turbo Core 3.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.