AMD E1-6010 vs Intel Core m3-8100Y

VS
Performance
E1-6010
677.52% of 36,991
Core m3-8100Y281% better
2,579.57% of 36,991

The Core m3-8100Y has 281% better performance than the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
E1-6010
No data available
Core m3-8100Y
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E1-6010 and the Core m3-8100Y for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core m3-8100Y
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD E1-6010 CPU

The AMD E1-6010 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of AMD's E1 lineup, which is based on the Beema microarchitecture. The E1-6010 is compatible with AMD Socket FT3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R2 Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The E1-6010 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E1-6010 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E1-6010 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1350.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The E1-6010 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R2 Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E1-6010 has the 710th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.83% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Core m3-8100Y CPU

The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The m3-8100Y is compatible with FCBGA1515 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Core m3-8100Y has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core m3-8100Y features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Core m3-8100Y does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Core m3-8100Y has the 562nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.97% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesE1--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2014--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
E1-6010
677.52% of 36,991
Core m3-8100Y281% better
2,579.57% of 36,991

The Core m3-8100Y has 281% better performance than the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The E1-6010 is ranked 710th with a score of 677.5, and the Core m3-8100Y is ranked 562nd with a score of 2,579.5.

Performance per dollar
E1-6010
No data available
Core m3-8100Y
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E1-6010 and the Core m3-8100Y for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:E1-6010 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i5-460M2,587+282%
Core i5-4302Y2,583+281%
Core m3-8100Y2,579.5+281%
Core i3-4030U2,558+278%
Core m5-6Y542,529+273%
E1-2500717.5+6%
E-450703+4%
E1-6010677.5
Celeron N2805637.5-6%
E-350609-10%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:E1-6010 orCore m3-8100Y
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
677.5
2,579.5
(+280.74%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
992
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
49
179.5
(+266.33%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
25
96.6
(+286.4%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
218
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
126
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
533
2,881
(+440.53%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
425
1,742
(+309.88%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FoundryGlobalFoundries--
Process Size28 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
SeriesE1--
MicroarchitectureBeema--
CodenameBeema--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
Cores22
Threads24
Clock Speed1350.0 MHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--3400.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier13.5x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache--4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
SocketAMD Socket FT3FCBGA1515
PCI ExpressPCIe 2.0 x8--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)10 W5 W
Tcase Max90 °C--
TJ Max--100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecE1-6010Core m3-8100Y
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R2 Graphics--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AES, F16C, BMI1, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.