AMD E1-6010 vs AMD A4-6210
The A4-6210 has 134% better performance than the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E1-6010 and the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD E1-6010 CPU
The AMD E1-6010 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of AMD's E1 lineup, which is based on the Beema microarchitecture. The E1-6010 is compatible with AMD Socket FT3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R2 Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The E1-6010 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E1-6010 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The E1-6010 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1350.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The E1-6010 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R2 Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The E1-6010 has the 709th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.83% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD A4-6210 CPU
The AMD A4-6210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-6210 is compatible with Socket FT3 (BGA769) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the A4-6210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A4-6210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The A4-6210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A4-6210 has the 657th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Series | E1 | -- |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2014 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The A4-6210 has 134% better performance than the E1-6010 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The E1-6010 is ranked 709th with a score of 677.5, and the A4-6210 is ranked 657th with a score of 1,587.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E1-6010 and the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Pentium N3510 | 1,619 | +139% |
| Celeron 2955U | 1,604 | +137% |
| A4-6210 | 1,587.5 | +134% |
| Celeron N2920 | 1,582 | +134% |
| A6-9225 | 1,568 | +131% |
| E1-2500 | 717.5 | +6% |
| E-450 | 703 | +4% |
| E1-6010 | 677.5 | |
| Celeron N2805 | 637.5 | -6% |
| E-350 | 609 | -10% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 677.5 | 1,587.5 (+134.32%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 49 | 134.5 (+174.49%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 25 | 37.5 (+50%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 218 | 514 (+135.78%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 126 | 187 (+48.41%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 533 | 1,494 (+180.3%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 425 | 611 (+43.76%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | -- |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | E1 | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Beema | -- |
| Codename | Beema | Mullins |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | -- |
| Memory Channels | Single-channel | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1350.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | -- |
| Multiplier | 13.5x | -- |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FT3 | Socket FT3 (BGA769) |
| PCI Express | PCIe 2.0 x8 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 W | 15 W |
| Tcase Max | 90 °C | -- |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | E1-6010 | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R2 Graphics | Radeon R3 Series |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AES, F16C, BMI1, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.