AMD E-350 vs Intel Celeron N3350

VS
Performance
E-350
6092% of 36,991
Celeron N3350119% better
1,3334% of 36,991

The Celeron N3350 has 119% better performance than the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
E-350
No data available
Celeron N3350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-350 and the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD E-350 CPU

The AMD E-350 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's E lineup, which is based on the Zacate microarchitecture. The E-350 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6310 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The E-350 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E-350 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E-350 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The E-350 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6310. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E-350 has the 712th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N3350 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3350 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3350 is compatible with Socket 1296 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 500 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3350 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 896 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3350 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3350 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 500. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3350 has the 681st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoE-350Celeron N3350
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesE--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
E-350
6092% of 36,991
Celeron N3350119% better
1,3334% of 36,991

The Celeron N3350 has 119% better performance than the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The E-350 is ranked 712th with a score of 609, and the Celeron N3350 is ranked 681st with a score of 1,333.

Performance per dollar
E-350
No data available
Celeron N3350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-350 and the Celeron N3350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-350 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Atom Z3745D1,345+121%
A4-3305M1,338.5+120%
Celeron N33501,333+119%
Atom Z37701,330+118%
Atom x5-Z83501,313+116%
E1-6010677.5+11%
Celeron N2805637.5+5%
E-350609
A4-1250607-0%
E1-1200604-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-350 orCeleron N3350
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkE-350Celeron N3350
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
609
1,333
(+118.88%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
85
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
46
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
179
405
(+126.26%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
105
246
(+134.29%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
423
1,108
(+161.94%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
490
803
(+63.88%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecE-350Celeron N3350
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Process Size40 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecE-350Celeron N3350
SeriesE--
MicroarchitectureZacate--
CodenameZacateApollo Lake
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecE-350Celeron N3350
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1600.0 MHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--2400.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier16.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecE-350Celeron N3350
L1 Cache64 KB896 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache--0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecE-350Celeron N3350
SocketAMD Socket FT1Socket 1296 FCBGA
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W6 W
TJ Max90 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecE-350Celeron N3350
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6310Intel HD Graphics 500
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.