Performance
E-350
6092% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 P960153% better
1,5424% of 36,991
The Phenom II X4 P960 has 153% better performance than the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
E-350
No data available
Phenom II X4 P960
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-350 and the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop E-350
Shop Phenom II X4 P960
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD E-350 CPU
The AMD E-350 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's E lineup, which is based on the Zacate microarchitecture. The E-350 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6310 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The E-350 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E-350 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The E-350 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1600.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The E-350 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6310. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The E-350 has the 712th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD Phenom II X4 P960 CPU
The AMD Phenom II X4 P960 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The X4 P960 is compatible with S1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 45 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Phenom II X4 P960 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Phenom II X4 P960 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Phenom II X4 P960 does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Phenom II X4 P960 has the 661st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Series | E | -- |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2011 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
E-350
6092% of 36,991
Phenom II X4 P960153% better
1,5424% of 36,991
The Phenom II X4 P960 has 153% better performance than the E-350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The E-350 is ranked 712th with a score of 609, and the Phenom II X4 P960 is ranked 661st with a score of 1,542.
Performance per dollar
E-350
No data available
Phenom II X4 P960
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-350 and the Phenom II X4 P960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:E-350 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Celeron N2920 | 1,582 | +160% |
| A6-9225 | 1,568 | +157% |
| Phenom II X4 P960 | 1,542 | +153% |
| Celeron 1017U | 1,532 | +152% |
| A4-5150M | 1,531 | +151% |
| E1-6010 | 677.5 | +11% |
| Celeron N2805 | 637.5 | +5% |
| E-350 | 609 | |
| A4-1250 | 607 | -0% |
| E1-1200 | 604 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:E-350 orPhenom II X4 P960
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 609 | 1,542 (+153.2%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 179 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 105 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 423 | 1,386 (+227.66%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 490 | 737 (+50.41%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 45 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | E | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Zacate | -- |
| Codename | Zacate | -- |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | -- |
| Memory Channels | Single-channel | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1600.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | -- |
| Multiplier | 16.0x | -- |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FT1 | S1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 W | 25 W |
| TJ Max | 90 °C | -- |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | E-350 | Phenom II X4 P960 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6310 | -- |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.