AMD E-240 vs Intel Core i3-380M

VS
Performance
E-240
2691% of 36,991
Core i3-380M789% better
2,391.56% of 36,991

The Core i3-380M has 789% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
E-240
No data available
Core i3-380M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-240 and the Core i3-380M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core i3-380M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD E-240 CPU

The AMD E-240 is an end-of-life 1-core (1-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's E lineup, which is based on the Zacate microarchitecture. The E-240 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6310 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The E-240 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E-240 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E-240 is a single-core and single-threaded CPU, making it not capable of processing multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The E-240 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6310. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E-240 has the 721st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 0.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Core i3-380M CPU

The Intel Core i3-380M is an end-of-life 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2010. It is part of Intel's Core i3 lineup, which is based on the Arrandale microarchitecture. The i3-380M is compatible with Intel Socket G1 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 32 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

The Core i3-380M supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Core i3-380M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 3 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core i3-380M features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.5 GHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Core i3-380M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i3-380M has the 577th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoE-240Core i3-380M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesECore i3
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q4 2010
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
E-240
2691% of 36,991
Core i3-380M789% better
2,391.56% of 36,991

The Core i3-380M has 789% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The E-240 is ranked 721st with a score of 269, and the Core i3-380M is ranked 577th with a score of 2,391.5.

Performance per dollar
E-240
No data available
Core i3-380M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-240 and the Core i3-380M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-240 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-9620P2,399+792%
FX-9800P2,393+790%
Core i3-380M2,391.5+789%
A10-9600P2,387+787%
Pentium Silver N50302,377+784%
C-70517+92%
C-50374+39%
E-240269

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-240 orCore i3-380M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkE-240Core i3-380M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
269
2,391.5
(+789.03%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
647
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
331
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
195
1,199
(+514.87%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
403
1,021
(+153.35%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecE-240Core i3-380M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size40 nm32 nm
Transistors--382 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecE-240Core i3-380M
SeriesECore i3
MicroarchitectureZacateArrandale
CodenameZacateArrandale
Memory SupportDDR3DDR3
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNoNo

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecE-240Core i3-380M
Cores12
Threads14
Clock Speed1500.0 MHz2.5 GHz
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Multiplier15.0x19.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecE-240Core i3-380M
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB
L3 Cache--3 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecE-240Core i3-380M
SocketAMD Socket FT1Intel Socket G1
PCI Express--PCIe 2.0
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W35 W
TJ Max--105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecE-240Core i3-380M
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6310Motherboard Dependent
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-VMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, TXT, VT-x, VT-d, HTT, Turbo Boost, AES-NI, Smart Cache

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.