AMD E-240 vs Intel Celeron N2820

VS
Performance
E-240
2691% of 36,991
Celeron N2820259% better
9673% of 36,991

The Celeron N2820 has 259% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
E-240
No data available
Celeron N2820
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-240 and the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2820
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD E-240 CPU

The AMD E-240 is an end-of-life 1-core (1-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's E lineup, which is based on the Zacate microarchitecture. The E-240 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6310 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The E-240 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E-240 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E-240 is a single-core and single-threaded CPU, making it not capable of processing multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The E-240 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6310. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E-240 has the 721st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 0.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2820 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2820 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2820 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2820 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2820 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.2 GHz, and it can boost up to 2.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2820 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2820 has the 703rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.61% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoE-240Celeron N2820
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesECeleron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q4 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
E-240
2691% of 36,991
Celeron N2820259% better
9673% of 36,991

The Celeron N2820 has 259% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The E-240 is ranked 721st with a score of 269, and the Celeron N2820 is ranked 703rd with a score of 967.

Performance per dollar
E-240
No data available
Celeron N2820
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-240 and the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-240 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron N3060993+269%
Celeron N2807976+263%
Celeron N2820967+259%
Celeron N3050932+246%
Celeron N2815871.5+224%
C-70517+92%
C-50374+39%
E-240269

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-240 orCeleron N2820
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkE-240Celeron N2820
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
269
967
(+259.48%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
58
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
37.9
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
195
502
(+157.44%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
403
602
(+49.38%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecE-240Celeron N2820
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size40 nm22 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecE-240Celeron N2820
SeriesECeleron
MicroarchitectureZacateBay Trail
CodenameZacateBay Trail-M
Memory SupportDDR3DDR3
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNoNo

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecE-240Celeron N2820
Cores12
Threads12
Clock Speed1500.0 MHz2.2 GHz
Turbo Clock--2.4 GHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier15.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecE-240Celeron N2820
L1 Cache64 KB56 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecE-240Celeron N2820
SocketAMD Socket FT1Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W7 W
TJ Max--105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecE-240Celeron N2820
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6310HD Graphics
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-VMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.