AMD E-240 vs Intel Celeron 6305

VS
Performance
E-240
2691% of 36,991
Celeron 6305620% better
1,935.55% of 36,991

The Celeron 6305 has 620% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
E-240
No data available
Celeron 6305
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-240 and the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 6305
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD E-240 CPU

The AMD E-240 is an end-of-life 1-core (1-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's E lineup, which is based on the Zacate microarchitecture. The E-240 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6310 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The E-240 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the E-240 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The E-240 is a single-core and single-threaded CPU, making it not capable of processing multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The E-240 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6310. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The E-240 has the 721st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 0.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron 6305 CPU

The Intel Celeron 6305 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 6305 is compatible with FCBGA1449 motherboards and is fabricated on a 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 6305 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 160 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2.5 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 6305 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 6305 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 6305 has the 619th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoE-240Celeron 6305
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesE--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
E-240
2691% of 36,991
Celeron 6305620% better
1,935.55% of 36,991

The Celeron 6305 has 620% better performance than the E-240 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The E-240 is ranked 721st with a score of 269, and the Celeron 6305 is ranked 619th with a score of 1,935.5.

Performance per dollar
E-240
No data available
Celeron 6305
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the E-240 and the Celeron 6305 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-240 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A6-52001,964.5+630%
Phenom II X4 N9701,940+621%
Celeron 63051,935.5+620%
Celeron N34501,925+616%
Core i3-2365M1,915+612%
C-70517+92%
C-50374+39%
E-240269

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:E-240 orCeleron 6305
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkE-240Celeron 6305
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
269
1,935.5
(+619.52%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
161.1
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
84
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
--
1,236
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
--
744
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
195
2,089
(+971.28%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
403
1,197
(+197.02%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecE-240Celeron 6305
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Process Size40 nm10 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecE-240Celeron 6305
SeriesE--
MicroarchitectureZacate--
CodenameZacateTiger Lake
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecE-240Celeron 6305
Cores12
Threads12
Clock Speed1500.0 MHz1800.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier15.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecE-240Celeron 6305
L1 Cache64 KB160 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2.5 MB
L3 Cache--4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecE-240Celeron 6305
SocketAMD Socket FT1FCBGA1449
Thermal Design Power (TDP)18 W15 W
TJ Max--100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecE-240Celeron 6305
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6310Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.