AMD C-70 vs Intel Celeron N2805
The Celeron N2805 has 23% better performance than the C-70 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-70 and the Celeron N2805 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD C-70 CPU
The AMD C-70 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2012. It is part of AMD's C lineup, which is based on the Ontario microarchitecture. The C-70 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6290 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The C-70 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the C-70 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The C-70 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 1333.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The C-70 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6290. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The C-70 has the 718th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.40% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron N2805 CPU
The Intel Celeron N2805 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2805 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Celeron N2805 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2805 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N2805 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1463.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N2805 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N2805 has the 710th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Series | C | Celeron |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2012 | Q3 2013 |
| Production Status | -- | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N2805 has 23% better performance than the C-70 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The C-70 is ranked 718th with a score of 517, and the Celeron N2805 is ranked 710th with a score of 637.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-70 and the Celeron N2805 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 517 | 637.5 (+23.31%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | -- | 44 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | -- | 24 |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 315 | 335 (+6.35%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 364 | 394 (+8.24%) |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Foundry | -- | Intel |
| Process Size | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | C | Celeron |
| Microarchitecture | Ontario | Bay Trail |
| Codename | Ontario | Bay Trail-M |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Memory Channels | Single-channel | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 1000.0 MHz | 1463.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 1333.0 MHz | -- |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 133 MHz |
| Multiplier | 5.0x | 11.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 56 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FT1 | Intel BGA 1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 W | 4 W |
| TJ Max | -- | 80 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | C-70 | Celeron N2805 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6290 | HD Graphics |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.