AMD C-60 vs AMD Pro A10-8700B

VS
Performance
C-60
5381% of 36,991
Pro A10-8700B295% better
2,123.56% of 36,991

The Pro A10-8700B has 295% better performance than the C-60 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
C-60
No data available
Pro A10-8700B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-60 and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Pro A10-8700B
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD C-60 CPU

The AMD C-60 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2011. It is part of AMD's C lineup, which is based on the Ontario microarchitecture. The C-60 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6290 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The C-60 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the C-60 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The C-60 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 1333.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The C-60 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6290. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The C-60 has the 717th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.45% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD Pro A10-8700B CPU

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Pro A10-8700B is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Pro A10-8700B has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro A10-8700B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Pro A10-8700B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro A10-8700B has the 604th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.74% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoC-60Pro A10-8700B
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesC--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
C-60
5381% of 36,991
Pro A10-8700B295% better
2,123.56% of 36,991

The Pro A10-8700B has 295% better performance than the C-60 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The C-60 is ranked 717th with a score of 538, and the Pro A10-8700B is ranked 604th with a score of 2,123.5.

Performance per dollar
C-60
No data available
Pro A10-8700B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-60 and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:C-60 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-8700P2,150.5+300%
Pentium B9602,139+298%
Pro A10-8700B2,123.5+295%
Core M-5Y512,122+294%
Core i3-3217U2,111.5+292%
E1-2100589+9%
A4-1200570+6%
C-60538
A6-9220e529-2%
C-70517-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:C-60 orPro A10-8700B
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkC-60Pro A10-8700B
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
538
2,123.5
(+294.7%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
675
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
192
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
70
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
154
1,006
(+553.25%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
91
475
(+421.98%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
290
2,224
(+666.9%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
354
1,123
(+217.23%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecC-60Pro A10-8700B
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size40 nm28 nm
Transistors--3,100 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecC-60Pro A10-8700B
SeriesC--
MicroarchitectureOntario--
CodenameOntarioCarrizo
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecC-60Pro A10-8700B
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1000.0 MHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock1333.0 MHz3200.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier10.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecC-60Pro A10-8700B
L1 Cache64 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecC-60Pro A10-8700B
SocketAMD Socket FT1Socket FP4 (968)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)9 W35 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecC-60Pro A10-8700B
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6290Radeon R6 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.