AMD C-50 vs Intel Celeron N3450

VS
Performance
C-50
3741% of 36,991
Celeron N3450415% better
1,9255% of 36,991

The Celeron N3450 has 415% better performance than the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
C-50
No data available
Celeron N3450
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-50 and the Celeron N3450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N3450
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD C-50 CPU

The AMD C-50 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's C lineup, which is based on the Ontario microarchitecture. The C-50 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6250 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The C-50 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the C-50 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The C-50 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The C-50 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6250. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The C-50 has the 719th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.01% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N3450 CPU

The Intel Celeron N3450 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N3450 is compatible with Socket 1296 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD Graphics 500 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N3450 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 896 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 0 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N3450 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N3450 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD Graphics 500. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N3450 has the 619th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.20% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoC-50Celeron N3450
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesC--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
C-50
3741% of 36,991
Celeron N3450415% better
1,9255% of 36,991

The Celeron N3450 has 415% better performance than the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The C-50 is ranked 719th with a score of 374, and the Celeron N3450 is ranked 619th with a score of 1,925.

Performance per dollar
C-50
No data available
Celeron N3450
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-50 and the Celeron N3450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:C-50 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Phenom II X4 N9701,940+419%
Celeron 63051,935.5+418%
Celeron N34501,925+415%
Core i3-2365M1,915+412%
Celeron 3865U1,906+410%
A6-9220e529+41%
C-70517+38%
C-50374
E-240269-28%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:C-50 orCeleron N3450
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkC-50Celeron N3450
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
374
1,925
(+414.71%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
143
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
44.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
124
653
(+426.61%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
71
240
(+238.03%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
265
1,987
(+649.81%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
312
767
(+145.83%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecC-50Celeron N3450
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Process Size40 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecC-50Celeron N3450
SeriesC--
MicroarchitectureOntario--
CodenameOntarioApollo Lake
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecC-50Celeron N3450
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1000.0 MHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--2200.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier10.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecC-50Celeron N3450
L1 Cache64 KB896 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache--0 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecC-50Celeron N3450
SocketAMD Socket FT1Socket 1296 FCBGA
Thermal Design Power (TDP)9 W6 W
TJ Max--105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecC-50Celeron N3450
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6250Intel HD Graphics 500
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.