AMD C-50 vs Intel Celeron N2810

VS
Performance
C-50
3741% of 36,991
Celeron N2810129% better
8582% of 36,991

The Celeron N2810 has 129% better performance than the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
C-50
No data available
Celeron N2810
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-50 and the Celeron N2810 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2810
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD C-50 CPU

The AMD C-50 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q1 2011. It is part of AMD's C lineup, which is based on the Ontario microarchitecture. The C-50 is compatible with AMD Socket FT1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 40 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6250 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The C-50 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the C-50 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The C-50 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The C-50 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6250. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The C-50 has the 720th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.01% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2810 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2810 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2810 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2810 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2810 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2810 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2810 has the 706th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoC-50Celeron N2810
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesCCeleron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2011Q3 2013
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
C-50
3741% of 36,991
Celeron N2810129% better
8582% of 36,991

The Celeron N2810 has 129% better performance than the C-50 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The C-50 is ranked 720th with a score of 374, and the Celeron N2810 is ranked 706th with a score of 858.

Performance per dollar
C-50
No data available
Celeron N2810
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the C-50 and the Celeron N2810 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:C-50 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Celeron N3050932+149%
Celeron N2815871.5+133%
Celeron N2810858+129%
E1-2500717.5+92%
E-450703+88%
A6-9220e529+41%
C-70517+38%
C-50374
E-240269-28%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:C-50 orCeleron N2810
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkC-50Celeron N2810
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
374
858
(+129.41%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
59
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
31
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
124
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
71
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
265
420
(+58.49%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
312
512
(+64.1%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecC-50Celeron N2810
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size40 nm22 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecC-50Celeron N2810
SeriesCCeleron
MicroarchitectureOntarioBay Trail
CodenameOntarioBay Trail-M
Memory SupportDDR3DDR3
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNoNo

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecC-50Celeron N2810
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1000.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier10.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecC-50Celeron N2810
L1 Cache64 KB56 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecC-50Celeron N2810
SocketAMD Socket FT1Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)9 W7 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecC-50Celeron N2810
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6250HD Graphics
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-VMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.