AMD A8-7410 vs Intel Core M-5Y51

VS
Performance
A8-7410
1,8355% of 36,991
Core M-5Y5116% better
2,1226% of 36,991

The Core M-5Y51 has 16% better performance than the A8-7410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A8-7410
No data available
Core M-5Y51
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-7410 and the Core M-5Y51 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Core M-5Y51
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A8-7410 CPU

The AMD A8-7410 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A8-7410 is compatible with Socket FT3 (BGA769) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A8-7410 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-7410 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2500.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-7410 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-7410 has the 630th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Core M-5Y51 CPU

The Intel Core M-5Y51 is a 2-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2014. It is part of Intel's Core M lineup, which is based on the Broadwell-Y microarchitecture. The M-5Y51 is compatible with Intel BGA 1234 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel HD 5300 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Core M-5Y51 supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the Core M-5Y51 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 256 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Core M-5Y51 features 2 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Core M-5Y51 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel HD 5300. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Core M-5Y51 has the 605th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.74% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA8-7410Core M-5Y51
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Series--Core M
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q4 2014
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A8-7410
1,8355% of 36,991
Core M-5Y5116% better
2,1226% of 36,991

The Core M-5Y51 has 16% better performance than the A8-7410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A8-7410 is ranked 630th with a score of 1,835, and the Core M-5Y51 is ranked 605th with a score of 2,122.

Performance per dollar
A8-7410
No data available
Core M-5Y51
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-7410 and the Core M-5Y51 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-7410 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium B9602,139+17%
Pro A10-8700B2,123.5+16%
Core M-5Y512,122+16%
Core i3-3217U2,111.5+15%
A6-3400M2,092+14%
A8-64101,867+2%
A6-73101,849+1%
A8-74101,835
A6-63101,825-1%
Pentium N35401,797-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-7410 orCore M-5Y51
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA8-7410Core M-5Y51
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,835
2,122
(+15.64%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
174
(+14.47%)
152
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
52
84
(+61.54%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
625
1,145
(+83.2%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
238
677
(+184.45%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,816
2,014
(+10.9%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
805
1,310
(+62.73%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA8-7410Core M-5Y51
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors930 million1,300 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA8-7410Core M-5Y51
Series--Core M
Microarchitecture--Broadwell-Y
CodenameCarrizo-LBroadwell-Y
Memory Support--DDR4
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA8-7410Core M-5Y51
Cores42
Threads44
Clock Speed2200.0 MHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2500.0 MHz2.6 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--11.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA8-7410Core M-5Y51
L1 Cache256 KB64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB
L3 Cache--4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA8-7410Core M-5Y51
SocketSocket FT3 (BGA769)Intel BGA 1234
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W5 W
TJ Max--95 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA8-7410Core M-5Y51
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R5 SeriesIntel HD 5300
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, HTT

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.