AMD A8-6410 vs AMD A6-3400M

VS
Performance
A8-6410
1,8675% of 36,991
A6-3400M12% better
2,0926% of 36,991

The A6-3400M has 12% better performance than the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A8-6410
No data available
A6-3400M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-6410 and the A6-3400M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A8-6410 CPU

The AMD A8-6410 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A8-6410 is compatible with BGA769 (FT3b) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A8-6410 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-6410 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-6410 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-6410 has the 628th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A6-3400M CPU

The AMD A6-3400M is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A6 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A6-3400M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6520G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A6-3400M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A6-3400M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A6-3400M features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.3 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A6-3400M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6520G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A6-3400M has the 607th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA8-6410A6-3400M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Series--A6
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2011
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A8-6410
1,8675% of 36,991
A6-3400M12% better
2,0926% of 36,991

The A6-3400M has 12% better performance than the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A8-6410 is ranked 628th with a score of 1,867, and the A6-3400M is ranked 607th with a score of 2,092.

Performance per dollar
A8-6410
No data available
A6-3400M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-6410 and the A6-3400M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-6410 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core M-5Y512,122+14%
Core i3-3217U2,111.5+13%
A6-3400M2,092+12%
Pentium N42002,087+12%
PRO A8-9600B2,081+11%
Celeron J40051,877+1%
Pentium N35301,875+0%
A8-64101,867
A6-73101,849-1%
A8-74101,835-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-6410 orA6-3400M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA8-6410A6-3400M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,867
2,092
(+12.05%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
165
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
49
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
577
(+12.48%)
513
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
216
(+1.41%)
213
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,762
(+48.07%)
1,190
CPU Mark Single-Thread
785
(+13.77%)
690
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA8-6410A6-3400M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size28 nm32 nm
Transistors930 million1,178 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA8-6410A6-3400M
Series--A6
Microarchitecture--Llano
CodenameBeemaLlano
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA8-6410A6-3400M
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed2000.0 MHz1400.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2400.0 MHz2.3 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--14.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA8-6410A6-3400M
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA8-6410A6-3400M
SocketBGA769 (FT3b)AMD Socket FS1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W35 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA8-6410A6-3400M
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R5 SeriesRadeon HD 6520G
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.