AMD A8-5550M vs Intel Celeron N4020

VS
Performance
A8-5550M52% better
2,5037% of 36,991
Celeron N4020
1,6504% of 36,991

The A8-5550M has 52% better performance than the Celeron N4020 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A8-5550M
No data available
Celeron N4020
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-5550M and the Celeron N4020 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N4020
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A8-5550M CPU

The AMD A8-5550M is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2013. It is part of AMD's A8 lineup, which is based on the Richland microarchitecture. The A8-5550M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1r2 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 8550G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A8-5550M supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the A8-5550M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-5550M features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.1 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-5550M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 8550G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-5550M has the 569th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N4020 CPU

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4020 is compatible with Socket 1090 FCBGA motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron N4020 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N4020 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2800.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N4020 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N4020 has the 651st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.46% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA8-5550MCeleron N4020
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesA8--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A8-5550M52% better
2,5037% of 36,991
Celeron N4020
1,6504% of 36,991

The A8-5550M has 52% better performance than the Celeron N4020 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A8-5550M is ranked 569th with a score of 2,503, and the Celeron N4020 is ranked 651st with a score of 1,650.

Performance per dollar
A8-5550M
No data available
Celeron N4020
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-5550M and the Celeron N4020 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-5550M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-2328M2,508+0%
Core i3-4005U2,507+0%
A8-5550M2,503
FX-7600P2,467-1%
A8-3520M2,452-2%
Celeron N29301,679-33%
A8-4555M1,654-34%
Celeron N40201,650-34%
A4-50001,635-35%
Celeron N29401,635-35%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-5550M orCeleron N4020
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA8-5550MCeleron N4020
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,503
(+51.7%)
1,650
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
476
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
188
(+47.92%)
127.1
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
68
73.8
(+8.53%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
659
(+21.14%)
544
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
280
343
(+22.5%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,863
(+19.81%)
1,555
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,038
1,151
(+10.89%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA8-5550MCeleron N4020
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Process Size32 nm14 nm
Transistors1,178 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA8-5550MCeleron N4020
SeriesA8--
MicroarchitectureRichland--
CodenameRichlandGemini Lake
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA8-5550MCeleron N4020
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed2.1 GHz1100.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3.1 GHz2800.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier21.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA8-5550MCeleron N4020
L1 Cache128 KB1,792 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA8-5550MCeleron N4020
SocketAMD Socket FS1r2Socket 1090 FCBGA
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W6 W
Tcase Max71 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA8-5550MCeleron N4020
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 8550GIntel UHD Graphics 600
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.