AMD A8-5550M vs AMD Pro A10-8700B

VS
Performance
A8-5550M18% better
2,5037% of 36,991
Pro A10-8700B
2,123.56% of 36,991

The A8-5550M has 18% better performance than the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A8-5550M
No data available
Pro A10-8700B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-5550M and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Pro A10-8700B
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A8-5550M CPU

The AMD A8-5550M is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2013. It is part of AMD's A8 lineup, which is based on the Richland microarchitecture. The A8-5550M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1r2 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 8550G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A8-5550M supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the A8-5550M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-5550M features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.1 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-5550M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 8550G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-5550M has the 569th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD Pro A10-8700B CPU

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The Pro A10-8700B is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Pro A10-8700B has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Pro A10-8700B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Pro A10-8700B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Pro A10-8700B has the 604th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.74% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesA8--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A8-5550M18% better
2,5037% of 36,991
Pro A10-8700B
2,123.56% of 36,991

The A8-5550M has 18% better performance than the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A8-5550M is ranked 569th with a score of 2,503, and the Pro A10-8700B is ranked 604th with a score of 2,123.5.

Performance per dollar
A8-5550M
No data available
Pro A10-8700B
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-5550M and the Pro A10-8700B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-5550M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-2328M2,508+0%
Core i3-4005U2,507+0%
A8-5550M2,503
FX-7600P2,467-1%
A8-3520M2,452-2%
A10-8700P2,150.5-14%
Pentium B9602,139-15%
Pro A10-8700B2,123.5-15%
Core M-5Y512,122-15%
Core i3-3217U2,111.5-16%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-5550M orPro A10-8700B
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,503
(+17.87%)
2,123.5
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
675
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
188
192
(+2.13%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
68
70
(+2.94%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
659
1,006
(+52.66%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
280
475
(+69.64%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,863
2,224
(+19.38%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,038
1,123
(+8.19%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size32 nm28 nm
Transistors1,178 million3,100 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
SeriesA8--
MicroarchitectureRichland--
CodenameRichlandCarrizo
Memory SupportDDR3--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed2.1 GHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3.1 GHz3200.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier21.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
SocketAMD Socket FS1r2Socket FP4 (968)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W35 W
Tcase Max71 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA8-5550MPro A10-8700B
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 8550GRadeon R6 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.