AMD A8-3500M vs AMD A10-9620P

VS
Performance
A8-3500M
2,2476% of 36,991
A10-9620P7% better
2,3996% of 36,991

The A10-9620P has 7% better performance than the A8-3500M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A8-3500M
No data available
A10-9620P
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-3500M and the A10-9620P for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop A10-9620P
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A8-3500M CPU

The AMD A8-3500M is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A8 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A8-3500M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6620G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A8-3500M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A8-3500M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-3500M features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-3500M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6620G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-3500M has the 590th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A10-9620P CPU

The AMD A10-9620P is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A10-9620P is compatible with BGA (FP4) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A10-9620P has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A10-9620P features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2500.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A10-9620P includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A10-9620P has the 575th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.49% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA8-3500MA10-9620P
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesA8--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A8-3500M
2,2476% of 36,991
A10-9620P7% better
2,3996% of 36,991

The A10-9620P has 7% better performance than the A8-3500M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A8-3500M is ranked 590th with a score of 2,247, and the A10-9620P is ranked 575th with a score of 2,399.

Performance per dollar
A8-3500M
No data available
A10-9620P
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A8-3500M and the A10-9620P for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-3500M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium 3825U2,440+9%
A6-3410MX2,411+7%
A10-9620P2,399+7%
FX-9800P2,393+6%
Core i3-380M2,391.5+6%
PRO A12-9800B2,275+1%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5+1%
A8-3500M2,247
A8-4500M2,243-0%
FX-75002,236.5-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A8-3500M orA10-9620P
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA8-3500MA10-9620P
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,247
2,399
(+6.76%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
230
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
72
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
620
1,099
(+77.26%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
231
493
(+113.42%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,410
2,587
(+83.48%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
822
1,310
(+59.37%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA8-3500MA10-9620P
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size32 nm28 nm
Transistors1,178 million3,100 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA8-3500MA10-9620P
SeriesA8--
MicroarchitectureLlano--
CodenameLlanoBristol Ridge
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA8-3500MA10-9620P
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed1500.0 MHz2500.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.4 GHz3400.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier15.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA8-3500MA10-9620P
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA8-3500MA10-9620P
SocketAMD Socket FS1BGA (FP4)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W15 W
TJ Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA8-3500MA10-9620P
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6620GRadeon R5 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.