Performance
A6-6310
1,8255% of 36,991
Celeron N412046% better
2,668.57% of 36,991
The Celeron N4120 has 46% better performance than the A6-6310 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Performance per dollar
A6-6310
No data available
Celeron N4120
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A6-6310 and the Celeron N4120 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Shop A6-6310
Shop Celeron N4120
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD A6-6310 CPU
The AMD A6-6310 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A6-6310 is compatible with BGA769 (FT3b) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R4 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the A6-6310 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A6-6310 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The A6-6310 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R4 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A6-6310 has the 631st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron N4120 CPU
The Intel Celeron N4120 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The N4120 is compatible with FCBGA1090 motherboards and is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron N4120 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 1,792 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 4 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron N4120 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron N4120 includes an integrated graphics solution called Intel UHD Graphics 600. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron N4120 has the 552nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 7.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
A6-6310
1,8255% of 36,991
Celeron N412046% better
2,668.57% of 36,991
The Celeron N4120 has 46% better performance than the A6-6310 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The A6-6310 is ranked 631st with a score of 1,825, and the Celeron N4120 is ranked 552nd with a score of 2,668.5.
Performance per dollar
A6-6310
No data available
Celeron N4120
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A6-6310 and the Celeron N4120 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline CPU:A6-6310 or
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core m5-6Y57 | 2,681 | +47% |
| Core m7-6Y75 | 2,678.5 | +47% |
| Celeron N4120 | 2,668.5 | +46% |
| Core i5-2467M | 2,666.5 | +46% |
| A10-5750M | 2,658 | +46% |
| A6-7310 | 1,849 | +1% |
| A8-7410 | 1,835 | +1% |
| A6-6310 | 1,825 | |
| Pentium N3540 | 1,797 | -2% |
| Core i3-3229Y | 1,795 | -2% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline CPU:A6-6310 orCeleron N4120
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,825 | 2,668.5 (+46.22%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 938.5 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 157 | 224 (+42.68%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 47 | 73.2 (+55.74%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 588 | 806 (+37.07%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 226 | 324 (+43.36%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,660 | 2,525 (+52.11%) |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 741 | 1,096 (+47.91%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | 930 million | -- |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Beema | Gemini Lake Refresh |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1800.0 MHz | 1100.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2400.0 MHz | 2600.0 MHz |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 1,792 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA769 (FT3b) | FCBGA1090 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 6 W |
| TJ Max | -- | 105 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | A6-6310 | Celeron N4120 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R4 Series | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.