AMD A6-5200 vs Intel Core 5 210H
The Core 5 210H has 760% better performance than the A6-5200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The Core 5 210H has 41% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: Intel Core i5-13400F.
Summary
About the AMD A6-5200 CPU
The AMD A6-5200 is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2013. It is part of AMD's A6 lineup, which is based on the Kabini microarchitecture. The A6-5200 is compatible with AMD Socket FT3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 8400 integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The A6-5200 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A6-5200 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A6-5200 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The A6-5200 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 8400. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A6-5200 has the 660th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 766 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.13% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X.
About the Intel Core 5 210H CPU
The Intel Core 5 210H is a 8-core (12-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2024 with a suggested retail price of $342. It is part of Intel's Core 5 lineup, which is based on the Raptor Lake-H Refresh microarchitecture. The 5 210H is compatible with Intel BGA 1744 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm manufacturing process. It features the Iris Xe Graphics 48EU integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The Core 5 210H supports DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the Core 5 210H has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 80 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 12 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Core 5 210H features 8 total cores which can process 12 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The 8 cores consist of 4 P-Cores and 4 E-Cores. P-Cores are designed for high-performance tasks and E-Cores are intended for efficiency and lighter tasks. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.2 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.8 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The Core 5 210H includes an integrated graphics solution called Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Core 5 210H has the 134th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 766 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 44.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X. Its 16,886 score and $342 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 49.37. This is the 60th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Perf. Physics benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Series | A6 | Core 5 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q4 2024 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $342 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Core 5 210H has 760% better performance than the A6-5200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The A6-5200 is ranked 660th with a score of 1,964.5, and the Core 5 210H is ranked 134th with a score of 16,886.
The Core 5 210H has 84% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X.
Core 5 210H's 49.37 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked CPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i9-11900H | 18,686 | +851% |
| Core i9-11980HK | 17,855.5 | +809% |
| Core 5 210H | 16,886 | +760% |
| Core i7-11800H | 16,736 | +752% |
| Core i7-10875H | 16,622 | +746% |
| A10-7300 | 2,000.5 | +2% |
| Pentium B970 | 1,989 | +1% |
| A6-5200 | 1,964.5 | |
| Phenom II X4 N970 | 1,940 | -1% |
| Celeron 6305 | 1,935.5 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5-13500HX | 71.89 | +46% |
| Core i5-13450HX | 67.43 | +37% |
| Core i7-13800H | 50.88 | +3% |
| Core 5 210H | 49.37 | |
| Core i7-12800HX | 48.96 | -1% |
| Core 5 220H | 48.17 | -2% |
| Core i7-12850HX | 47.51 | -4% |
| Core i7-13705H | 46.24 | -6% |
| Core i5-11400H | 45.95 | -7% |
| Core i5-1340P | 44.87 | -9% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,964.5 | 16,886 (+759.56%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy CPU | -- | 6,295 |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 156 | 1,483 (+850.64%) |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 42.4 | 247 (+482.55%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 585 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 208 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,664 | -- |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 664 | -- |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| Series | A6 | Core 5 |
| Microarchitecture | Kabini | Raptor Lake-H Refresh |
| Codename | Kabini | Raptor Lake-H |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200 |
| Memory Channels | Single-channel | Dual-channel |
| ECC Memory | No | No |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Performance Cores (P-cores) | -- | 4 |
| Efficient Cores (E-cores) | -- | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 2000.0 MHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Turbo Clock | -- | 4.8 GHz |
| P-core Clock | -- | 2.2 GHz |
| P-core Turbo Clock | -- | 4.8 GHz |
| E-core Clock Speed | -- | 1600.0 MHz |
| E-core Turbo Clock | -- | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20.0x | 22.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | -- | 12 MB |
| E-core L1 Cache | -- | 96 KB |
| E-core L2 Cache | -- | 4 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FT3 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x8, PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 W | 45 W |
| Power Limit 1 (PL1) | -- | 45 W |
| Power Limit 2 (PL2) | -- | 115 W |
| Tcase Max | 90 °C | 72 °C |
| TJ Max | -- | 100 °C |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | A6-5200 | Core 5 210H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 8400 | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AES, F16C, BMI1, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, EIST, Intel 64, XD bit, VT-x, VT-d, AES-NI, TSX, TXT, CLMUL, F16C, BMI1, BMI2, ABM, ADX, RdRand, DL Boost, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.