AMD A6-4400M vs Intel Celeron 2957U
The Celeron 2957U has 9% better performance than the A6-4400M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A6-4400M and the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD A6-4400M CPU
The AMD A6-4400M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2012. It is part of AMD's A6 lineup, which is based on the Trinity microarchitecture. The A6-4400M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1r2 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 7520G integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The A6-4400M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A6-4400M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 96 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A6-4400M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.7 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.2 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The A6-4400M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 7520G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A6-4400M has the 673rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.79% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the Intel Celeron 2957U CPU
The Intel Celeron 2957U is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2957U is compatible with FCBGA1168 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the Celeron 2957U has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Celeron 2957U features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The Celeron 2957U does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 2957U has the 664th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.12% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Series | A6 | -- |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2012 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The Celeron 2957U has 9% better performance than the A6-4400M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The A6-4400M is ranked 673rd with a score of 1,403, and the Celeron 2957U is ranked 664th with a score of 1,524.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A6-4400M and the Celeron 2957U for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| A4-5150M | 1,531 | +9% |
| A9-9425 | 1,527 | +9% |
| Celeron 2957U | 1,524 | +9% |
| Celeron N3150 | 1,516 | +8% |
| Celeron N4500 | 1,507 | +7% |
| E2-3800 | 1,440 | +3% |
| A6-5350M | 1,414.5 | +1% |
| A6-4400M | 1,403 | |
| A4-3300M | 1,396 | -0% |
| Pentium 3560Y | 1,365 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,403 | 1,524 (+8.62%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | -- | 105 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | -- | 55 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 409 | -- |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 318 | -- |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 1,010 (+17.85%) | 857 |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 1,027 (+31.84%) | 779 |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | -- |
| Process Size | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Transistors | 1,303 million | -- |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| Series | A6 | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Trinity | -- |
| Codename | Trinity | -- |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | -- |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz | 1400.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3.2 GHz | -- |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | -- |
| Multiplier | 27.0x | -- |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | -- | 2 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FS1r2 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCI Express | PCIe 2.0 | -- |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 W | 15 W |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | A6-4400M | Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 7520G | -- |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, FMA3, F16C, XOP, ABM, TBM, Turbo Core | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.