AMD A6-3400M vs AMD A8-6410

VS
Performance
A6-3400M12% better
2,0926% of 36,991
A8-6410
1,8675% of 36,991

The A6-3400M has 12% better performance than the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A6-3400M
No data available
A8-6410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A6-3400M and the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A6-3400M CPU

The AMD A6-3400M is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A6 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A6-3400M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6520G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A6-3400M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A6-3400M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A6-3400M features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1400.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.3 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A6-3400M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6520G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A6-3400M has the 607th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A8-6410 CPU

The AMD A8-6410 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A8-6410 is compatible with BGA769 (FT3b) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A8-6410 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-6410 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-6410 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-6410 has the 628th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA6-3400MA8-6410
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesA6--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A6-3400M12% better
2,0926% of 36,991
A8-6410
1,8675% of 36,991

The A6-3400M has 12% better performance than the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A6-3400M is ranked 607th with a score of 2,092, and the A8-6410 is ranked 628th with a score of 1,867.

Performance per dollar
A6-3400M
No data available
A8-6410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A6-3400M and the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A6-3400M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core M-5Y512,122+1%
Core i3-3217U2,111.5+1%
A6-3400M2,092
Pentium N42002,087-0%
PRO A8-9600B2,081-1%
Celeron J40051,877-10%
Pentium N35301,875-10%
A8-64101,867-11%
A6-73101,849-12%
A8-74101,835-12%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A6-3400M orA8-6410
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA6-3400MA8-6410
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,092
(+12.05%)
1,867
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
165
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
49
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
513
577
(+12.48%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
213
216
(+1.41%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,190
1,762
(+48.07%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
690
785
(+13.77%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA6-3400MA8-6410
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size32 nm28 nm
Transistors1,178 million930 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA6-3400MA8-6410
SeriesA6--
MicroarchitectureLlano--
CodenameLlanoBeema
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA6-3400MA8-6410
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed1400.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.3 GHz2400.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier14.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA6-3400MA8-6410
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA6-3400MA8-6410
SocketAMD Socket FS1BGA769 (FT3b)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W15 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA6-3400MA8-6410
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6520GRadeon R5 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.