AMD A4-7210 vs Intel Celeron N2820

VS
Performance
A4-721095% better
1,8865% of 36,991
Celeron N2820
9673% of 36,991

The A4-7210 has 95% better performance than the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-7210
No data available
Celeron N2820
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-7210 and the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2820
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-7210 CPU

The AMD A4-7210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-7210 is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A4-7210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-7210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-7210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-7210 has the 624th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2820 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2820 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2820 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2820 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2820 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2820 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.2 GHz, and it can boost up to 2.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2820 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2820 has the 703rd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.61% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-7210Celeron N2820
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Series--Celeron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q4 2013
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-721095% better
1,8865% of 36,991
Celeron N2820
9673% of 36,991

The A4-7210 has 95% better performance than the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-7210 is ranked 624th with a score of 1,886, and the Celeron N2820 is ranked 703rd with a score of 967.

Performance per dollar
A4-7210
No data available
Celeron N2820
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-7210 and the Celeron N2820 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-7210 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-2365M1,915+2%
Celeron 3865U1,906+1%
A4-72101,886
Celeron 1037U1,880-0%
Celeron J40051,877-0%
Celeron N3060993-47%
Celeron N2807976-48%
Celeron N2820967-49%
Celeron N3050932-51%
Celeron N2815871.5-54%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-7210 orCeleron N2820
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-7210Celeron N2820
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,886
(+95.04%)
967
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
157
(+170.69%)
58
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
46
(+21.37%)
37.9
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
571
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
206
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,665
(+231.67%)
502
CPU Mark Single-Thread
725
(+20.43%)
602
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-7210Celeron N2820
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size28 nm22 nm
Transistors930 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-7210Celeron N2820
Series--Celeron
Microarchitecture--Bay Trail
CodenameMullinsBay Trail-M
Memory Support--DDR3
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-7210Celeron N2820
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz2.2 GHz
Turbo Clock2200.0 MHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-7210Celeron N2820
L1 Cache256 KB56 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-7210Celeron N2820
SocketSocket FP4 (968)Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W7 W
TJ Max--105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-7210Celeron N2820
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R3 GraphicsHD Graphics
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.