AMD A4-7210 vs AMD A9-9425

VS
Performance
A4-721024% better
1,8865% of 36,991
A9-9425
1,5274% of 36,991

The A4-7210 has 24% better performance than the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-7210
No data available
A9-9425
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-7210 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-7210 CPU

The AMD A4-7210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-7210 is compatible with Socket FP4 (968) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A4-7210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-7210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2200.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-7210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-7210 has the 624th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A9-9425 CPU

The AMD A9-9425 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2016. It is part of AMD's A9 lineup, which is based on the Stoney Ridge microarchitecture. The A9-9425 is compatible with AMD Socket FT4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A9-9425 supports DDR4 memory. In terms of cache, the A9-9425 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A9-9425 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 3.1 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.7 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A9-9425 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A9-9425 has the 664th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.13% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-7210A9-9425
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Series--A9
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2016
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-721024% better
1,8865% of 36,991
A9-9425
1,5274% of 36,991

The A4-7210 has 24% better performance than the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-7210 is ranked 624th with a score of 1,886, and the A9-9425 is ranked 664th with a score of 1,527.

Performance per dollar
A4-7210
No data available
A9-9425
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-7210 and the A9-9425 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-7210 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-2365M1,915+2%
Celeron 3865U1,906+1%
A4-72101,886
Celeron 1037U1,880-0%
Celeron J40051,877-0%
Celeron 1017U1,532-19%
A4-5150M1,531-19%
A9-94251,527-19%
Celeron 2957U1,524-19%
Celeron N31501,516-20%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-7210 orA9-9425
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-7210A9-9425
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,886
(+23.51%)
1,527
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
705
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
157
(+25.6%)
125
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
46
76
(+65.22%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
571
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
206
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,665
(+10.48%)
1,507
CPU Mark Single-Thread
725
1,322
(+82.34%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-7210A9-9425
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors930 million1,200 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-7210A9-9425
Series--A9
Microarchitecture--Stoney Ridge
CodenameMullinsStoney Ridge
Memory Support--DDR4
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-7210A9-9425
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz3.1 GHz
Turbo Clock2200.0 MHz3.7 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--31.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-7210A9-9425
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-7210A9-9425
SocketSocket FP4 (968)AMD Socket FT4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W15 W
Tcase Max--74 °C
TJ Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-7210A9-9425
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R3 GraphicsRadeon R5
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.