PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD A4-6210 vs Intel Celeron N2940

AMD
VS
Intel
Performance
A4-6210
1,587.54% of 36,991
Celeron N29403% better
1,6354% of 36,991

The Celeron N2940 has 3% better performance than the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-6210
No data available
Celeron N2940
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-6210 and the Celeron N2940 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron N2940
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-6210 CPU

The AMD A4-6210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-6210 is compatible with Socket FT3 (BGA769) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A4-6210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-6210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-6210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-6210 has the 657th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2940 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2940 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2940 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2940 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2940 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2940 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1830.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.3 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2940 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2940 has the 651st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.42% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-6210Celeron N2940
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Series--Celeron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2014
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-6210
1,587.54% of 36,991
Celeron N29403% better
1,6354% of 36,991

The Celeron N2940 has 3% better performance than the A4-6210 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-6210 is ranked 657th with a score of 1,587.5, and the Celeron N2940 is ranked 651st with a score of 1,635.

Performance per dollar
A4-6210
No data available
Celeron N2940
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-6210 and the Celeron N2940 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-6210 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A8-4555M1,654+4%
Celeron N40201,650+4%
A4-50001,635+3%
Celeron N29401,635+3%
A9-94201,632+3%
Pentium N35101,619+2%
Celeron 2955U1,604+1%
A4-62101,587.5
Celeron N29201,582-0%
A6-92251,568-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-6210 orCeleron N2940
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-6210Celeron N2940
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,587.5
1,635
(+2.99%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
134.5
(+21.72%)
110.5
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
37.5
(+5.63%)
35.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
514
(+2.8%)
500
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
187
(+11.98%)
167
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,494
(+44.07%)
1,037
CPU Mark Single-Thread
611
(+0.99%)
605
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-6210Celeron N2940
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size28 nm22 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-6210Celeron N2940
Series--Celeron
Microarchitecture--Bay Trail
CodenameMullinsBay Trail-M
Memory Support--DDR3
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-6210Celeron N2940
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz1830.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--2.3 GHz
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-6210Celeron N2940
L1 Cache256 KB56 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-6210Celeron N2940
SocketSocket FT3 (BGA769)Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W7 W
TJ Max--105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-6210Celeron N2940
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R3 SeriesHD Graphics
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.