AMD A4-6210 vs AMD A9-9410

VS
Performance
A4-62108% better
1,587.54% of 36,991
A9-9410
1,4704% of 36,991

The A4-6210 has 8% better performance than the A9-9410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-6210
No data available
A9-9410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-6210 and the A9-9410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-6210 CPU

The AMD A4-6210 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A4-6210 is compatible with Socket FT3 (BGA769) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R3 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A4-6210 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-6210 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-6210 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R3 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-6210 has the 658th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.29% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A9-9410 CPU

The AMD A9-9410 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2016. It is part of AMD's A9 lineup, which is based on the Stoney Ridge microarchitecture. The A9-9410 is compatible with AMD Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A9-9410 supports DDR4 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A9-9410 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 160 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A9-9410 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.9 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.5 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A9-9410 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A9-9410 has the 670th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.97% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-6210A9-9410
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Series--A9
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2016
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-62108% better
1,587.54% of 36,991
A9-9410
1,4704% of 36,991

The A4-6210 has 8% better performance than the A9-9410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-6210 is ranked 658th with a score of 1,587.5, and the A9-9410 is ranked 670th with a score of 1,470.

Performance per dollar
A4-6210
No data available
A9-9410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-6210 and the A9-9410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-6210 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium N35101,619+2%
Celeron 2955U1,604+1%
A4-62101,587.5
Celeron N29201,582-0%
A6-92251,568-1%
Celeron N45001,507-5%
Atom x7-Z87501,499-6%
A9-94101,470-7%
A6-92201,469.5-7%
E2-38001,440-9%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-6210 orA9-9410
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-6210A9-9410
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,587.5
(+7.99%)
1,470
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
732
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
134.5
(+3.46%)
130
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
37.5
63
(+68%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
514
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
187
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,494
1,527
(+2.21%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
611
1,343
(+119.8%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-6210A9-9410
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Foundry--GlobalFoundries
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors--1,200 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-6210A9-9410
Series--A9
Microarchitecture--Stoney Ridge
CodenameMullinsStoney Ridge
Memory Support--DDR4
Memory Channels--Single-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-6210A9-9410
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1800.0 MHz2.9 GHz
Turbo Clock--3.5 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--29.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-6210A9-9410
L1 Cache256 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-6210A9-9410
SocketSocket FT3 (BGA769)AMD Socket FP4
PCI Express--PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W15 W
TJ Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-6210A9-9410
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R3 SeriesRadeon R5
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD64, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, FMA3, FMA4, F16C, TBM, XOP, AMD-V, EVP, Turbo Core

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.