AMD A4-5000 vs AMD 3020e

VS
Performance
A4-5000
1,6354% of 36,991
3020e60% better
2,6187% of 36,991

The 3020e has 60% better performance than the A4-5000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-5000
No data available
3020e
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-5000 and the 3020e for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-5000 CPU

The AMD A4-5000 is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2013. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Kabini microarchitecture. The A4-5000 is compatible with AMD Socket FT3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 8330 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A4-5000 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-5000 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-5000 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-5000 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 8330. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-5000 has the 652nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.42% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD 3020e CPU

The AMD 3020e is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 3020e is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the AMD Radeon Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the 3020e has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 192 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 3020e features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The 3020e includes an integrated graphics solution called AMD Radeon Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The 3020e has the 556th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 7.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-50003020e
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesA4--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2013--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-5000
1,6354% of 36,991
3020e60% better
2,6187% of 36,991

The 3020e has 60% better performance than the A4-5000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-5000 is ranked 652nd with a score of 1,635, and the 3020e is ranked 556th with a score of 2,618.

Performance per dollar
A4-5000
No data available
3020e
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-5000 and the 3020e for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-5000 or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-5750M2,658+63%
Pentium Silver N50002,619+60%
3020e2,618+60%
Core M-5Y10a2,605+59%
A10-4600M2,596.5+59%
A8-4555M1,654+1%
Celeron N40201,650+1%
A4-50001,635
Celeron N29401,6350%
A9-94201,632-0%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-5000 or3020e
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-50003020e
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,635
2,618
(+60.12%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
119
196
(+64.71%)
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
33
92
(+178.79%)
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
463
1,101
(+137.8%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
156
664
(+325.64%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,295
2,458
(+89.81%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
508
1,419
(+179.33%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-50003020e
ManufacturerAMDAMD
FoundryGlobalFoundries--
Process Size28 nm14 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-50003020e
SeriesA4--
MicroarchitectureKabini--
CodenameKabini--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsSingle-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-50003020e
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed1500.0 MHz1200.0 MHz
Turbo Clock--2600.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier15.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-50003020e
L1 Cache64 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache--4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-50003020e
SocketAMD Socket FT3--
PCI ExpressPCIe 2.0 x8--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W6 W
Tcase Max90 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-50003020e
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 8330AMD Radeon Graphics
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AES, F16C, BMI1, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.