AMD A4-4355M vs Intel Celeron 2970M

VS
Performance
A4-4355M
9943% of 36,991
Celeron 2970M129% better
2,272.56% of 36,991

The Celeron 2970M has 129% better performance than the A4-4355M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-4355M
No data available
Celeron 2970M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-4355M and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop Celeron 2970M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-4355M CPU

The AMD A4-4355M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q3 2012. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Trinity microarchitecture. The A4-4355M is compatible with AMD Socket FP2 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 7400G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A4-4355M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-4355M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 96 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-4355M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1900.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-4355M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 7400G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-4355M has the 700th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.69% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron 2970M CPU

The Intel Celeron 2970M is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 2970M is compatible with FCPGA946 motherboards and is fabricated on a 22 nm manufacturing process.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the Celeron 2970M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 2 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron 2970M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2200.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron 2970M does not include an integrated graphics solution. A dedicated graphics card will be required if you require a monitor with your computer.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron 2970M has the 589th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.14% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
SeriesA4--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ3 2012--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-4355M
9943% of 36,991
Celeron 2970M129% better
2,272.56% of 36,991

The Celeron 2970M has 129% better performance than the A4-4355M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-4355M is ranked 700th with a score of 994, and the Celeron 2970M is ranked 589th with a score of 2,272.5.

Performance per dollar
A4-4355M
No data available
Celeron 2970M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-4355M and the Celeron 2970M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-4355M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core M-5Y10c2,311+132%
PRO A12-9800B2,275+129%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5+129%
A8-3500M2,247+126%
A8-4500M2,243+126%
Celeron N28401,072.5+8%
Celeron N28301,027+3%
A4-4355M994
Celeron N3060993-0%
Celeron N2807976-2%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-4355M orCeleron 2970M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
994
2,272.5
(+128.62%)
3DMark Time Spy CPU
--
900
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
164
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
85
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
806
1,501
(+86.23%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
813
1,245
(+53.14%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
ManufacturerAMDIntel
FoundryGlobalFoundries--
Process Size32 nm22 nm
Transistors1,303 million960 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
SeriesA4--
MicroarchitectureTrinity--
CodenameTrinity--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1900.0 MHz2200.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.4 GHz--
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier25.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
L1 Cache96 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache--2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
SocketAMD Socket FP2FCPGA946
PCI ExpressPCIe 2.0--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)17 W37 W
Tcase Max100 °C--
TJ Max--100 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-4355MCeleron 2970M
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 7400G--
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, FMA3, F16C, XOP, ABM, TBM, Turbo Core--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.