AMD A4-3305M vs AMD 3020e

VS
Performance
A4-3305M
1,338.54% of 36,991
3020e96% better
2,6187% of 36,991

The 3020e has 96% better performance than the A4-3305M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-3305M
No data available
3020e
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-3305M and the 3020e for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-3305M CPU

The AMD A4-3305M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A4-3305M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6480G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A4-3305M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-3305M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-3305M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1900.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.5 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-3305M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6480G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-3305M has the 680th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.62% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD 3020e CPU

The AMD 3020e is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 3020e is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the AMD Radeon Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the 3020e has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 192 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 3020e features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The 3020e includes an integrated graphics solution called AMD Radeon Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The 3020e has the 556th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 7.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-3305M3020e
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesA4--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-3305M
1,338.54% of 36,991
3020e96% better
2,6187% of 36,991

The 3020e has 96% better performance than the A4-3305M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-3305M is ranked 680th with a score of 1,338.5, and the 3020e is ranked 556th with a score of 2,618.

Performance per dollar
A4-3305M
No data available
3020e
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-3305M and the 3020e for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-3305M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-5750M2,658+99%
Pentium Silver N50002,619+96%
3020e2,618+96%
Core M-5Y10a2,605+95%
A10-4600M2,596.5+94%
Atom x5-Z85001,353+1%
Atom Z3745D1,345+0%
A4-3305M1,338.5
Celeron N33501,333-0%
Atom Z37701,330-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-3305M or3020e
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-3305M3020e
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,338.5
2,618
(+95.59%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
196
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
92
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
323
1,101
(+240.87%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
212
664
(+213.21%)
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
734
2,458
(+234.88%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
824
1,419
(+72.21%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-3305M3020e
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size32 nm14 nm
Transistors1,178 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-3305M3020e
SeriesA4--
MicroarchitectureLlano--
CodenameLlano--
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-3305M3020e
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1900.0 MHz1200.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.5 GHz2600.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier19.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-3305M3020e
L1 Cache128 KB192 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
L3 Cache--4 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-3305M3020e
SocketAMD Socket FS1--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W6 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-3305M3020e
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6480GAMD Radeon Graphics
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.