AMD A4-3300M vs AMD A8-7100
The A8-7100 has 22% better performance than the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-3300M and the A8-7100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD A4-3300M CPU
The AMD A4-3300M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A4-3300M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6480G integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
The A4-3300M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-3300M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A4-3300M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1900.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.5 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.
Integrated Graphics
The A4-3300M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6480G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A4-3300M has the 674th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
About the AMD A8-7100 CPU
The AMD A8-7100 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A8-7100 is compatible with Socket FP3 (906) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.
Memory and Cache
In terms of cache, the A8-7100 has a L2 cache of 4 MB in size which provides fast access to instructions and data.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The A8-7100 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.
Integrated Graphics
The A8-7100 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.
Benchmark Performance
The A8-7100 has the 647th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 720 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.62% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
General Info
General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Series | A4 | -- |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2011 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | -- |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Benchmark Performance
The A8-7100 has 22% better performance than the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
The A4-3300M is ranked 674th with a score of 1,396, and the A8-7100 is ranked 647th with a score of 1,710.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-3300M and the A8-7100 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
| CPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| E2-7110 | 1,725 | +24% |
| Celeron N4000 | 1,712.5 | +23% |
| A8-7100 | 1,710 | +22% |
| Celeron N2930 | 1,679 | +20% |
| A8-4555M | 1,654 | +18% |
| A6-5350M | 1,414.5 | +1% |
| A6-4400M | 1,403 | +1% |
| A4-3300M | 1,396 | |
| Pentium 3560Y | 1,365 | -2% |
| A4-4300M | 1,355 | -3% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| CPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark 11 Performance Physics | 1,396 | 1,710 (+22.49%) |
| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | -- | 133 |
| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | -- | 44 |
| Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core | 395 | 584 (+47.85%) |
| Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core | 231 | 263 (+13.85%) |
| CPU Mark Multi-Thread | 710 | -- |
| CPU Mark Single-Thread | 788 | -- |
Technical Specs
Manufacturing Details
Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.
| Spec | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Process Size | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | 2,410 million |
Architecture
CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.
| Spec | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | A4 | -- |
| Microarchitecture | Llano | -- |
| Codename | Llano | Bald Eagle |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | -- |
| Memory Channels | Dual-channel | -- |
| ECC Memory | No | -- |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.
| Spec | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 1900.0 MHz | 1800.0 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3000.0 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | -- |
| Multiplier | 19.0x | -- |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | -- |
Cache
CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.
| Spec | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
Compatibility & Power Consumption
Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.
| Spec | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket FS1 | Socket FP3 (906) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 W | 19 W |
Graphics, Features, & Extensions
Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.
| Spec | A4-3300M | A8-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6480G | Radeon R5 Series |
| Extensions / Technologies | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V | -- |
Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.