AMD A4-3300M vs AMD A6-6310

VS
Performance
A4-3300M
1,3964% of 36,991
A6-631031% better
1,8255% of 36,991

The A6-6310 has 31% better performance than the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A4-3300M
No data available
A6-6310
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-3300M and the A6-6310 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A4-3300M CPU

The AMD A4-3300M is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A4-3300M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6480G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A4-3300M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-3300M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-3300M features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1900.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.5 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-3300M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6480G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-3300M has the 675th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 3.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A6-6310 CPU

The AMD A6-6310 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A6-6310 is compatible with BGA769 (FT3b) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R4 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A6-6310 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A6-6310 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1800.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A6-6310 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R4 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A6-6310 has the 631st best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.93% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA4-3300MA6-6310
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesA4--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2011--
Production StatusEnd-of-life--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A4-3300M
1,3964% of 36,991
A6-631031% better
1,8255% of 36,991

The A6-6310 has 31% better performance than the A4-3300M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A4-3300M is ranked 675th with a score of 1,396, and the A6-6310 is ranked 631st with a score of 1,825.

Performance per dollar
A4-3300M
No data available
A6-6310
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A4-3300M and the A6-6310 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-3300M or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A6-73101,849+32%
A8-74101,835+31%
A6-63101,825+31%
Pentium N35401,797+29%
Core i3-3229Y1,795+29%
A6-5350M1,414.5+1%
A6-4400M1,403+1%
A4-3300M1,396
Pentium 3560Y1,365-2%
A4-4300M1,355-3%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A4-3300M orA6-6310
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA4-3300MA6-6310
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
1,396
1,825
(+30.73%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
--
157
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
--
47
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
392
588
(+50%)
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
228
(+0.88%)
226
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
710
1,660
(+133.8%)
CPU Mark Single-Thread
788
(+6.34%)
741
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA4-3300MA6-6310
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size32 nm28 nm
Transistors1,178 million930 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA4-3300MA6-6310
SeriesA4--
MicroarchitectureLlano--
CodenameLlanoBeema
Memory SupportDDR3--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA4-3300MA6-6310
Cores24
Threads24
Clock Speed1900.0 MHz1800.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2.5 GHz2400.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier19.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA4-3300MA6-6310
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA4-3300MA6-6310
SocketAMD Socket FS1BGA769 (FT3b)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W15 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA4-3300MA6-6310
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6480GRadeon R4 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.