AMD A10 Pro-7350B vs Intel Celeron N2840

VS
Performance
A10 Pro-7350B93% better
2,0666% of 36,991
Celeron N2840
1,072.53% of 36,991

The A10 Pro-7350B has 93% better performance than the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A10 Pro-7350B
No data available
Celeron N2840
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10 Pro-7350B and the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop A10 Pro-7350B
Shop Celeron N2840
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A10 Pro-7350B CPU

The AMD A10 Pro-7350B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A10 Pro-7350B is compatible with Socket FP3 (906) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A10 Pro-7350B has a L2 cache of 4 MB in size which provides fast access to instructions and data.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A10 Pro-7350B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3300.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A10 Pro-7350B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A10 Pro-7350B has the 610th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.59% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2840 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2840 is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2014. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2840 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2840 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2840 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2840 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2.2 GHz, and it can boost up to 2.6 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2840 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2840 has the 698th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 2.90% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Series--Celeron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2014
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A10 Pro-7350B93% better
2,0666% of 36,991
Celeron N2840
1,072.53% of 36,991

The A10 Pro-7350B has 93% better performance than the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A10 Pro-7350B is ranked 610th with a score of 2,066, and the Celeron N2840 is ranked 698th with a score of 1,072.5.

Performance per dollar
A10 Pro-7350B
No data available
Celeron N2840
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10 Pro-7350B and the Celeron N2840 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10 Pro-7350B or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium N42002,087+1%
PRO A8-9600B2,081+1%
A10 Pro-7350B2,066
Core i3-4020Y2,061-0%
Core i5-4210Y2,047-1%
A6 Pro-7050B1,133-45%
Atom x5-Z83001,123.5-46%
Celeron N28401,072.5-48%
Celeron N28301,027-50%
A4-4355M994-52%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10 Pro-7350B orCeleron N2840
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,066
(+92.63%)
1,072.5
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
162
(+113.16%)
76
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
55
(+44.74%)
38
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
658
(+121.55%)
297
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
281
(+57.87%)
178
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,921
(+227.26%)
587
CPU Mark Single-Thread
921
(+37.26%)
671
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size28 nm22 nm
Transistors2,410 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
Series--Celeron
Microarchitecture--Bay Trail
CodenameBald EagleBay Trail-M
Memory Support--DDR3
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
Cores42
Threads42
Clock Speed2100.0 MHz2.2 GHz
Turbo Clock3300.0 MHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
L1 Cache--56 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
SocketSocket FP3 (906)Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)19 W7 W
TJ Max--105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BCeleron N2840
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R6 SeriesHD Graphics
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.