AMD A10 Pro-7350B vs AMD A8-3500M

VS
Performance
A10 Pro-7350B
2,0666% of 36,991
A8-3500M9% better
2,2476% of 36,991

The A8-3500M has 9% better performance than the A10 Pro-7350B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A10 Pro-7350B
No data available
A8-3500M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10 Pro-7350B and the A8-3500M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop A10 Pro-7350B
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A10 Pro-7350B CPU

The AMD A10 Pro-7350B is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A10 Pro-7350B is compatible with Socket FP3 (906) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A10 Pro-7350B has a L2 cache of 4 MB in size which provides fast access to instructions and data.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A10 Pro-7350B features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2100.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3300.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A10 Pro-7350B includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A10 Pro-7350B has the 610th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.59% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A8-3500M CPU

The AMD A8-3500M is an end-of-life 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2011. It is part of AMD's A8 lineup, which is based on the Llano microarchitecture. The A8-3500M is compatible with AMD Socket FS1 motherboards and is fabricated on a 32 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 6620G integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A8-3500M supports DDR3 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A8-3500M has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 128 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-3500M features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1500.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2.4 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-3500M includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 6620G. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-3500M has the 590th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Series--A8
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2011
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A10 Pro-7350B
2,0666% of 36,991
A8-3500M9% better
2,2476% of 36,991

The A8-3500M has 9% better performance than the A10 Pro-7350B for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A10 Pro-7350B is ranked 610th with a score of 2,066, and the A8-3500M is ranked 590th with a score of 2,247.

Performance per dollar
A10 Pro-7350B
No data available
A8-3500M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10 Pro-7350B and the A8-3500M for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10 Pro-7350B or
CPUBenchmark Performance
PRO A12-9800B2,275+10%
Celeron 2970M2,272.5+10%
A8-3500M2,247+9%
A8-4500M2,243+9%
FX-75002,236.5+8%
Pentium N42002,087+1%
PRO A8-9600B2,081+1%
A10 Pro-7350B2,066
Core i3-4020Y2,061-0%
Core i5-4210Y2,047-1%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10 Pro-7350B orA8-3500M
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,066
2,247
(+8.76%)
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
162
--
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
55
--
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
658
(+6.13%)
620
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
281
(+21.65%)
231
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
1,921
(+36.24%)
1,410
CPU Mark Single-Thread
921
(+12.04%)
822
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size28 nm32 nm
Transistors2,410 million1,178 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
Series--A8
Microarchitecture--Llano
CodenameBald EagleLlano
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Dual-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed2100.0 MHz1500.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3300.0 MHz2.4 GHz
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--15.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
L1 Cache--128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
SocketSocket FP3 (906)AMD Socket FS1
Thermal Design Power (TDP)19 W35 W

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA10 Pro-7350BA8-3500M
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R6 SeriesRadeon HD 6620G
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Power Now!, NX bit, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.