AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Celeron N2920

VS
Performance
A10-9620P52% better
2,3996% of 36,991
Celeron N2920
1,5824% of 36,991

The A10-9620P has 52% better performance than the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A10-9620P
No data available
Celeron N2920
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10-9620P and the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop A10-9620P
Shop Celeron N2920
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A10-9620P CPU

The AMD A10-9620P is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A10-9620P is compatible with BGA (FP4) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A10-9620P has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 512 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A10-9620P features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2500.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 3400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A10-9620P includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A10-9620P has the 575th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 6.49% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the Intel Celeron N2920 CPU

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q4 2013. It is part of Intel's Celeron lineup, which is based on the Bay Trail microarchitecture. The N2920 is compatible with Intel BGA 1170 motherboards and is fabricated on Intel's 22 nm manufacturing process. It features the HD Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The Celeron N2920 supports DDR3 memory. In terms of cache, the Celeron N2920 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 56 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 512 KB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Celeron N2920 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1860.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2000.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The Celeron N2920 includes an integrated graphics solution called HD Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Celeron N2920 has the 659th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 4.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA10-9620PCeleron N2920
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Series--Celeron
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q4 2013
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A10-9620P52% better
2,3996% of 36,991
Celeron N2920
1,5824% of 36,991

The A10-9620P has 52% better performance than the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A10-9620P is ranked 575th with a score of 2,399, and the Celeron N2920 is ranked 659th with a score of 1,582.

Performance per dollar
A10-9620P
No data available
Celeron N2920
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10-9620P and the Celeron N2920 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10-9620P or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Pentium 3825U2,440+2%
A6-3410MX2,411+1%
A10-9620P2,399
FX-9800P2,393-0%
Core i3-380M2,391.5-0%
Celeron 2955U1,604-33%
A4-62101,587.5-34%
Celeron N29201,582-34%
A6-92251,568-35%
Phenom II X4 P9601,542-36%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10-9620P orCeleron N2920
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA10-9620PCeleron N2920
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,399
(+51.64%)
1,582
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
230
(+94.09%)
118.5
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
72
(+121.54%)
32.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,099
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
493
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,587
(+172.32%)
950
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,310
(+137.32%)
552
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA10-9620PCeleron N2920
ManufacturerAMDIntel
Foundry--Intel
Process Size28 nm22 nm
Transistors3,100 million--

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA10-9620PCeleron N2920
Series--Celeron
Microarchitecture--Bay Trail
CodenameBristol RidgeBay Trail-M
Memory Support--DDR3
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA10-9620PCeleron N2920
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed2500.0 MHz1860.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3400.0 MHz2000.0 MHz
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA10-9620PCeleron N2920
L1 Cache512 KB56 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA10-9620PCeleron N2920
SocketBGA (FP4)Intel BGA 1170
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W7 W
TJ Max90 °C105 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA10-9620PCeleron N2920
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R5 SeriesHD Graphics
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EIST, XD bit, BPT, NX

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.