AMD A10-8700P vs AMD A8-6410

VS
Performance
A10-8700P15% better
2,150.56% of 36,991
A8-6410
1,8675% of 36,991

The A10-8700P has 15% better performance than the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
A10-8700P
No data available
A8-6410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10-8700P and the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Shop A10-8700P
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD A10-8700P CPU

The AMD A10-8700P is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2015. It is part of AMD's A10 lineup, which is based on the Excavator microarchitecture. The A10-8700P is compatible with AMD Socket FP4 motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R6 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A10-8700P supports DDR3-2133 memory and features a dual-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 2 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A10-8700P has a L2 cache of 2 MB in size which provides fast access to instructions and data.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A10-8700P features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1.8 GHz, and it can boost up to 3.2 GHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A10-8700P includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R6. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A10-8700P has the 602nd best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A8-6410 CPU

The AMD A8-6410 is a 4-core (4-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The A8-6410 is compatible with BGA769 (FT3b) motherboards and is fabricated on a 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon R5 Series integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the A8-6410 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 256 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 2 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A8-6410 features 4 total cores which can process 4 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 2000.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2400.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The A8-6410 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon R5 Series. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A8-6410 has the 628th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 5.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoA10-8700PA8-6410
ManufacturerAMDAMD
SeriesA10--
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ2 2015--
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
A10-8700P15% better
2,150.56% of 36,991
A8-6410
1,8675% of 36,991

The A10-8700P has 15% better performance than the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The A10-8700P is ranked 602nd with a score of 2,150.5, and the A8-6410 is ranked 628th with a score of 1,867.

Performance per dollar
A10-8700P
No data available
A8-6410
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the A10-8700P and the A8-6410 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10-8700P or
CPUBenchmark Performance
Core i3-4012Y2,159+0%
A10-5745M2,155+0%
A10-8700P2,150.5
Pentium B9602,139-1%
Pro A10-8700B2,123.5-1%
Celeron J40051,877-13%
Pentium N35301,875-13%
A8-64101,867-13%
A6-73101,849-14%
A8-74101,835-15%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:A10-8700P orA8-6410
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkA10-8700PA8-6410
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,150.5
(+15.18%)
1,867
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
194
(+17.58%)
165
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
69
(+40.82%)
49
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,129
(+95.67%)
577
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
506
(+134.26%)
216
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,237
(+26.96%)
1,762
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,143
(+45.61%)
785
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

SpecA10-8700PA8-6410
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors3,100 million930 million

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

SpecA10-8700PA8-6410
SeriesA10--
MicroarchitectureExcavator--
CodenameCarrizoBeema
Memory SupportDDR3-2133--
Memory ChannelsDual-channel--
ECC MemoryNo--

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

SpecA10-8700PA8-6410
Cores44
Threads44
Clock Speed1.8 GHz2000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock3.2 GHz2400.0 MHz
Base Clock100 MHz--
Multiplier18.0x--
Multiplier UnlockedNo--

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

SpecA10-8700PA8-6410
L1 Cache--256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

SpecA10-8700PA8-6410
SocketAMD Socket FP4BGA769 (FT3b)
PCI ExpressPCIe 3.0--
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W15 W
TJ Max90 °C--

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

SpecA10-8700PA8-6410
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R6Radeon R5 Series
Extensions / TechnologiesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4, SSE4a, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI, F16C, FMA3, FMA4, TBM, XOP, AMD64, AMD-V, Turbo Core 3.0--

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.