AMD 3020e vs AMD A4-1250

VS
Performance
3020e331% better
2,6187% of 36,991
A4-1250
6072% of 36,991

The 3020e has 331% better performance than the A4-1250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Performance per dollar
3020e
No data available
A4-1250
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the 3020e and the A4-1250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD 3020e CPU

The AMD 3020e is a 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. The 3020e is fabricated on a 14 nm manufacturing process. It features the AMD Radeon Graphics integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

In terms of cache, the 3020e has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 192 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1. Its L3 cache, a shared resource among the CPU's cores, has a capacity of 4 MB.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The 3020e features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1200.0 MHz, and it can boost up to 2600.0 MHz under heavy workloads. Higher clock speeds result in better performance for the same microarchitecture.

Integrated Graphics

The 3020e includes an integrated graphics solution called AMD Radeon Graphics. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The 3020e has the 556th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 7.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

About the AMD A4-1250 CPU

The AMD A4-1250 is an end-of-life 2-core (2-thread) processor built for the mobile CPU market. It launched in Q2 2013. It is part of AMD's A4 lineup, which is based on the Temash microarchitecture. The A4-1250 is compatible with AMD Socket FT3 motherboards and is fabricated on GlobalFoundries's 28 nm manufacturing process. It features the Radeon HD 8210 integrated graphics solution.

Memory and Cache

The A4-1250 supports DDR3 memory and features a single-channel memory controller, allowing it to utilize 1 memory modules simultaneously. In terms of cache, the A4-1250 has multiple levels of cache. Its L1 cache, which is the smallest and fastest, is 64 KB in size, providing rapid access to crucial instructions. Its L2 cache, at 1 MB, is larger but slower than the L1.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The A4-1250 features 2 total cores which can process 2 threads simultaneously. The multi-threading capability allows the CPU to execute multiple computational tasks in parallel. The base clock speed of the CPU is 1000.0 MHz. Higher clock speeds result in higher performance for the same microarchitecture. The multiplier is locked, making it incapable of overclocking for pushing performance further.

Integrated Graphics

The A4-1250 includes an integrated graphics solution called Radeon HD 8210. This graphics processor is directly integrated into the CPU and is not as powerful as a dedicated graphics card. While integrated graphics can handle basic tasks like web browsing and office applications, it is not suitable for more demanding activities such as gaming or video editing, where a dedicated graphics card offers superior performance.

Benchmark Performance

The A4-1250 has the 713th best 3DMark 11 Performance Physics score among the 721 benchmarked CPUs in our database. It achieves 1.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

General Info

General overview of the CPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

Info3020eA4-1250
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Series--A4
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date--Q2 2013
Production Status--End-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
3020e331% better
2,6187% of 36,991
A4-1250
6072% of 36,991

The 3020e has 331% better performance than the A4-1250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

The 3020e is ranked 556th with a score of 2,618, and the A4-1250 is ranked 713th with a score of 607.

Performance per dollar
3020e
No data available
A4-1250
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the 3020e and the A4-1250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline CPU:3020e or
CPUBenchmark Performance
A10-5750M2,658+2%
Pentium Silver N50002,619+0%
3020e2,618
Core M-5Y10a2,605-0%
A10-4600M2,596.5-1%
Celeron N2805637.5-76%
E-350609-77%
A4-1250607-77%
E1-1200604-77%
E1-2100589-78%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar CPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline CPU:3020e orA4-1250
CPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other CPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both CPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful CPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
Benchmark3020eA4-1250
3DMark 11 Performance Physics
2,618
(+331.3%)
607
Cinebench R15 Multi-Core
196
(+503.08%)
32.5
Cinebench R15 Single-Core
92
(+348.78%)
20.5
Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1,101
--
Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
664
--
CPU Mark Multi-Thread
2,458
(+505.42%)
406
CPU Mark Single-Thread
1,419
(+331.31%)
329
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Manufacturing Details

Information about the CPU's manufacturing like its foundry, process size, and transistor count.

Spec3020eA4-1250
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Foundry--GlobalFoundries
Process Size14 nm28 nm

Architecture

CPU architecture specs like its memory channels, memory support, and microarchitecture. Newer CPU architectures can minimize bottlenecks and improve execution efficiency using more advanced techniques.

Spec3020eA4-1250
Series--A4
Microarchitecture--Temash
Codename--Temash
Memory Support--DDR3
Memory Channels--Single-channel
ECC Memory--No

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can handle instructions and tasks. These have a strong impact on the CPU's performance.

Spec3020eA4-1250
Cores22
Threads22
Clock Speed1200.0 MHz1000.0 MHz
Turbo Clock2600.0 MHz--
Base Clock--100 MHz
Multiplier--10.0x
Multiplier Unlocked--No

Cache

CPU cache specs like its L1 & L2 cache. These provide the CPU with a small, but super-fast memory access. A larger cache can improve a CPU's performance.

Spec3020eA4-1250
L1 Cache192 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB--

Compatibility & Power Consumption

Compatibility and power consumption information like its socket type, thermal design power, power limits. These can help verify the CPU's compatibility with other PC components.

Spec3020eA4-1250
Socket--AMD Socket FT3
PCI Express--PCIe 2.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)6 W8 W
Tcase Max--90 °C

Graphics, Features, & Extensions

Additional CPU features like its bundled coolers, integrated graphics, and extensions/technologies.

Spec3020eA4-1250
Integrated GraphicsAMD Radeon GraphicsRadeon HD 8210
Extensions / Technologies--MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AES, F16C, BMI1, AMD64, CnQ, NX bit, AMD-V

Check out these comparisons for similar CPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar CPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance Physics benchmark and MSRP.